5/10/2022
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has limited the authorized use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to individuals 18 years of age and older for whom other authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate, and to individuals 18 years of age and older who elect to receive the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine because they would otherwise not receive a COVID-19 vaccine.
In this protracted authorization, the FDA is saying the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are better and you should only use J&J if you can’t get access to the other two vaccines or for some reason can’t take the other two vaccines. They are saying the J&J vaccine is not safe. When will they admit the other two vaccines are not safe as well?
From the Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers, this is stated.
The Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine can cause thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) which may be life-threatening. TTS may involve thrombosis at unusual locations for a thrombus (i.e., cerebral vein, visceral artery or vein, extremity artery, central artery or vein) or in an extremity vein or pulmonary artery. Among reported cases of TTS following administration of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine, symptoms began approximately one to two weeks after vaccination.
In the first line of the fact sheet, they admit the vaccine can cause life-threatening injuries. They admit this can happen well after the injection, something the vaccine safety community has been saying for many months now.
I am sure all of you have heard this news that the FDA admitted that these experimental jabs are dangerous. This article is a refresher on how the J&J vaccine works differently from the other two mRNA vaccines. I still argue that the J&J is less dangerous than the two mRNA vaccines, this refresher is my hypothesis as to why. The data on the dangers of all three vaccines is out there and still being released by the FDA on the first of every month and more people are dissecting data that is coming to light. This data includes Ontario Canada, Walgreens, and CDC and UK mortality data.
Refresher on how Janssen/J&J vaccine works. The J&J vaccine is a viral vector vaccine. In this case the viral vector is an adenovirus. This virus attaches to your cells upon injection and then acts as any virus does and injects genetic material into your cells. This genetic material tricks your cells into making a protein or group of proteins. If it were a native adenovirus, it would have your cells make more adenovirus, until that cell cannot make anymore. After that, the multiplied adenoviruses spread to other cells and repeat the cycle. This is where the term “going viral” comes from. One person sends a video to many people and the video goes viral. The J&J adenovirus tricks your body into making Covid spike proteins instead of more adenoviruses. The idea is then your body will develop antibodies to the Covid spike protein. Now these antibodies will help if you encounter native Covid in your daily activities.
The two mRNA vaccines are very similar. The difference is the delivery agent to your cells. We just discussed how the J&J is using an adenovirus. The delivery agent for the mRNA vaccine is not explained well. The CDC says “mRNA vaccines use mRNA created in a laboratory to teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein—that triggers an immune response inside our bodies.”. We know the lab created mRNA would be destroyed by our immune systems before it made its way into any of our cells. This is why the two mRNA companies use the lipid nanoparticles. In some cutting edge technology these particles protect the mRNA from destruction from our bodies. This is similar to the lipid bilayers that make up cell walls and many evolutionist think this is how the first organisms came to exist. It is a polar vs. non-polar molecule property. We don’t need to go down that Chemistry lesson for now. They mRNA vaccines trick your body’s cells into manufacturing Covid spike proteins and then the theory is your body will create antibodies against the foreign protein.
We now know the loose spike protein is cytotoxic to our bodies. It appears to effect all tissues, but especially the heart tissue. The Salk Institute showed that in this study, along with a study in the Journal Circulation. There was another study done that showed in vitro that loose spike protein was worse for heart tissue than spike protein as part of the Covid virus. With all of this information on the cytotoxicity of the loose spike protein, why would we want our bodies generating loose spike protein? I cannot imagine a more inane logic. We know Covid is bad; we know the loose spike protein is the cytotoxic part of the virus; so let’s have our bodies make it; so that if we get Covid; our bodies know how to fight only part of the bad virus? How effective will antibodies from only one portion of the virus be in fighting the virus. As we now know after over a year of trying these vaccines, they are not effective at all in fighting the virus. In fact, it appears to have a negative effect.
Now for the hypothesis, mRNA vaccines are more dangerous than the J&J/Janssen adenovirus vaccine. Both tell your body to create dangerous loose spike protein, how much is unknown. We know the Moderna has more mRNA in it than Pfizer, but we don’t know how much spike protein is being manufactured or when it stops, or if it stops. The lipid nanoparticle is a very new technology that has not been widely used. In fact, mRNA vaccines are only the second drug for which this technology has been approved as a drug delivery system. The other is Onpattro and it has only been around since 2018. Onpattro is a medication for the treatment of polyneuropathy in people with hereditary transthyretin-mediated amyloidosis, a fatal rare disease that is estimated to affect 50,000 people worldwide. If I had a fatal disease, I would like to have the right to try the new technology. Covid is far from fatal, and we have no idea of the effects of these lipid nanoparticles on our bodies. Our body’s immune systems know what to do about adenoviruses. We have evolved with them for years. Who knows if our bodies know what to do with a small solid fatty substance directly injected into our bloodstream. Another reason I hypothesize the J&J is less dangerous, is the one shot vs. two shot (at the time) prescription. The second (or third or fourth and counting) shot will come with it a period of time where your body has some antibodies against a protein that your body would be actively creating or creating at a faster rate.
All of these vaccines need to be halted until we know these answers. The FDA appears to have unrecommended the J&J vaccine, the other two need to come next.